:: Appendix
C: Central Features of the Cal Poly Plan ::(December 1997)
|
| The Cal Poly Plan offers a model for
how the State of California can meet future demand for
public higher education from its citizens in a time
of dramatic enrollment growth, rising public expectations
for quality and efficiency, and limited public resources.
The Plan supports new ways of educating and supporting
students, including creative approaches to teaching
and learning and their measurement, curriculum design
and scheduling, and the application of information technology
to instruction. These efforts require multi-year investments
in human resources as well as in equipment. Cal Poly's
campus academic fee is designed as one of several means
to support these improvements while maintaining the
University's distinct polytechnic mission.
The four goals of the Cal Poly Plan all contribute
to the end of improving the quality, effectiveness,
efficiency, and accessibility of higher education. The
means for achieving these goals include innovative approaches
(noted in italics) that complement more traditional
means to increase the University's effectiveness and
which are potentially transferable quality and productivity
improvements:
|
| 1) Institutional Productivity
Greater efficiency in the use
of physical resources and fixed costs: Expansion
of summer quarter; scheduling efficiencies; and reconfiguring
academic space to meet the needs of new teaching and
learning models.
Greater productivity in support
and administrative services: Re-engineering
administrative processes, using information technology
where appropriate; customer-orientation for administrative
and support services.
|
| 2) Student Learning and Progress
|
Improvements in access
to classes, academic advising, and other measures to
assure timely progress to degree completion. Student
progress can be improved in a variety of ways:
- Encourage optimal loads -- Curriculum streamlining;
- Improve scheduling -- Across day and week to meet
student needs;
- Reduce bottlenecks -- Additional sections; advising;
curriculum streamlining;
- Reduce unnecessary courses -- Advising; Articulation;
Automated degree audit;
- Facilitate degree completion -- Senior evaluations;
Senior project monitoring;
- Reduce time to degree -- Published mutual expectations;
- Make student learning less dependent on time, place,
and seat time in a classroom.
|
Improvements in access to classes, academic advising, and other measures to assure academic success. Student learning can be enhanced by several means:
|
- Assure quality and currency --Clear
learning outcomes;
- Improve quality and academic success
-- Improved teaching effectiveness; Technology-mediated
instruction, including World Wide Web applications;
- Increase academic success rates -- Shadow classes,,
supplemental instruction, advising.
|
Moderate increase in enrollment
during the academic year, to return to Master Plan
capacity of 15,000 full-time equivalent students during
the academic year.
In addition to summer expansion, an
increase will enable Cal Poly to meet the needs of
more students without over-extending its physical
resources. In the future, Cal Poly will focus enrollment
growth in high demand programs not generally available
at other public universities in California.
|
| 3) Educational Quality
Preparation of graduates with
state-of-the-art knowledge and competencies needed
for life and work in the twenty-first century: New
ways to reinforce its hallmark "learn by doing"
approach to education emphasizing laboratory
activities, projects, field experience, and service
learning. Satisfaction of graduates, employers, graduate
programs, and civic communities.
|
| 4) Accountability and Assessment
Development of measures of accountability
and procedures for assessment that demonstrate the
stewardship of the University to both internal and
external constituents: Baseline data, performance
expectations, and assessment plans that provide
qualitative as well as numeric information. Statistical
records and survey research. Sophisticated student
cohort analysis to analyze retention and graduation
rates as well as time to degree.
Three other principles of the Cal
Poly Plan also make innovative contributions toward
improving the quality and accessibility of higher education:
|
| 1) Partnership and Shared Responsibility
Finance and Investment:
Early in the planning process Cal Poly identified
the following partners in financing higher education:
- The CSU agreed to support the Cal Poly
Plan by guaranteeing that State appropriations and
State University Fees allocated for enrollment growth
or quality enhancement would not fall below system-wide
averages as a result of the Cal Poly Plan;
- The University has reallocated some
State General Fund revenues and State University Fees,
and developed operational efficiencies in support
of the Plan. Specifically, during the first year,
the University reallocated internal resources to expand
Library services;
- Friends and patrons of Cal Poly have
been asked to contribute to Cal Poly Plan purposes
and goals, including support for need-based scholarships,
and industry donations and discounts for instructional
technology and equipment; and
- Students and their families support
a campus academic fee for Cal Poly Plan projects and
activities that directly benefit student learning
and progress.
Affordability: The Plan
recognizes the need to assure the affordability of
higher education. Reducing the time to degree by one
academic quarter will save a student more than the
cumulative cost of the campus academic fee over four
years because that student will not have to pay fees
nor living expenses for that additional study time.
Financial Aid: The Plan
recognizes the need to assure the affordability of
higher education. Reducing the time to degree by one
academic quarter will save a student more than the
cumulative cost of the campus academic fee over four
years because that student will not have to pay fees
nor living expenses for that additional study time.
The Plan recognizes the need to assure
the affordability of higher education. Reducing the
time to degree by one academic quarter will save a
student more than the cumulative cost of the campus
academic fee over four years because that student
will not have to pay fees nor living expenses for
that additional study time.
|
| 2) Expenditure Plan for Investments
Direct, Visible Benefit to Students:
A paramount principle of the Cal Poly Plan is that
all projects and activities funded by the campus academic
fee must make a demonstrable difference toward student
progress and educational quality.
RFP: The University adopted a
Request for Proposal process to allocate revenues.
|
| 3) Joint Governance and Constituency
Consultation
Steering Committee: The Cal Poly
Plan is based on a consensual process integrating
campus consultation with the management structure
of the University.
Planning Process: Further,
the Cal Poly Plan follows a planning process that
emphasizes extensive consultation with constituencies
through focus groups, forums, and survey research.
Top
|