Cal Poly Logo
Cal Poly Plan 
C a l i f o r n i a   P o l y t e c h n i c   S t a t e   U n i v e r s i t y  



:: 2004-05 Faculty Positions ::

Follow the links below to each College's Year End Report for Faculty Positions:

College of Agriculture
College of Architecture and Environmental Design
Orfalea College of Business
College of Engineering
College of Liberal Arts
College of Science and Mathematics


COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE   Top
Dr. Wayne Howard, Agribusiness Department

Approximately two-thirds of California's rural property appraisers (who estimate the market value of real estate for lending and other business purposes) are Cal Poly graduates. These rural appraisals are different than residential appraisals in that the factors that need to be considered for a rural or agricultural property are much more complex than the factors affecting the value of a typical urban house. Hence, Cal Poly agribusiness majors have the right mix of agricultural science and business practices to serve the needs of California's rural property market. The demand for the course where I teach rural property appraisal is such that I taught three sections of the course in 2004/2005. Students learn by doing an appraisal of an actual property. In several cases these reports have been of sufficient quality to get the student hired as an appraiser.

A number of things came together to result in an award winning master's thesis. Roland Fumasi, an AGB graduate, worked for several years in industry before returning to Cal Poly for a master's degree. His thesis asked if Salinas Valley lettuce growers were better off with a contract price or an open market price. With funding from the California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops, Roland attended a short course at Texas A&M to learn specialized simulation modeling, which he then used to answer our question: lettuce growers make more money in the long run by producing under contract.

This next year I will continue to teach rural appraisal, along with farm management, agricultural development and most likely a smattering of economic theory courses.

Instructor

  • AGB 310 : Agricultural Finance
  • AGB 313 : Agricultural Economic Analysis
  • AGB 322 : Farm and Ranch Management
  • AGB 326 : Rural Appraisal
  • AGB 457 : Livestock Management
  • AGB 510 : Agribusiness Development


Dr. Lisa Nicholson, Food Science and Nutrition Department

Professional Development

  • Achieved tenure standing and was promoted to Associate Professor.
  • Awarded the Monsanto New Faculty Award for Teaching in the College of Agriculture.
  • Lead responsibility for an accreditation site visit from the Commission on the Accreditation for Dietetics Education in the American Dietetics Association. The Applied Nutrition concentration within the Nutrition major received Developmental accreditation in 2005. We are currently waiting to be notified whether our Didactic Program in Dietetics will be fully accredited (notification in October 2005).

Departmental, College, University and Community Service

  • Continue to serve as the Director of the Didactic Program in Dietetics for the Nutrition department.
  • Continue to serve on the CAGR Instructional Enhancement Committee. With the IEC, I participated in organizing the 2005 Mini-Conference.
  • Also serve on the Cal Poly Community-Based Learning Committee, the Multicultural Pluralism in Education, and the Health Professions Committee.
  • Also serve as the CAGR Community-Based Learning representative at Cal Poly and am the Employment Equity representative to FSN.
  • Active in state and regional professional dietetics organizations as well as the American Society for Nutrition Education.
  • Elected to be Secretary for the Coastal Tri-county Dietetics regional organization. With this group I will work as the San Luis Obispo County National Nutrition Month (March 2006) coordinator. I hope to have many of our Cal Poly Nutrition and Food Science students involved in this work.
  • One of my most active community commitments is the Gold Coast Collaborative for Nutrition and Fitness. This advocacy group works in San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties to create a community where all members enjoy an environment that supports healthy eating and physical activity. With this group I have had the opportunity to network and collaborate with many regional health professionals and policy makers. Through this association, I have been able to place many Cal Poly nutrition students at school sites, at community events, and at supermarkets where the students get a chance to educate the public on the ‘5-a-Day and Be Active’ message.

My teaching philosophy is to actively involve students on a variety of levels throughout the educational experience. Engaged learners develop critical thinking skills in applying theory to real life situations. I love to communicate to students the complexity of health behaviors, especially in regards to nutrition. Graduates who understand how behaviors develop and change will become effective nutrition professionals. We can create more valuable health education tools when these materials address the context in which our clients and patients make health choices. My research funding and efforts reflect this philosophy – provide nutrition education in diverse communities. I currently have several research grants in progress to deliver nutrition education in reduced income populations. Both graduate and undergraduate students have had the opportunity to work in these projects.

In my ‘Nutrition Education and Communication’ class (FSN 415), senior-level students work in the community teaching nutrition to pre-school children, seniors, and others. In this community-based learning and teaching activity, students work and learn beyond the university walls and gain a better understanding of their roles as future community members. Learning is enhanced through the use of reflective journals, which are kept throughout the experience. Over the last several years students have created a variety of healthy eating tips in flyers, pamphlets, and calendars for the EOC Head Start and Child Care Providers of San Luis Obispo County, the SLO Senior Nutrition Program, community sports teams, after school programs, the Girl Scouts, the Anderson Hotel residents, and many more organizations including many of the student groups and teams here on Cal Poly. This year the FSN 415 class will also learn communication and team building skills at the Chumash Challenge course.

My goal in FSN 416, ‘Community Nutrition’ is to help our students in learning about the health care delivery system, the public and non-profit nutrition assistance programs, and health promotion and disease prevention activities. Students, as a final project, write a grant proposal suitable for a community agency. To write a fundable grant students need to research a nutrition need in a given community, conceptualize a program to address this need, budget the costs appropriately and conceptualize outcome measures to evaluate program success. In 2006 I hope to make this course a community based learning course with students working at local community food banks.

Throughout my classes I:
  • Make extensive use of computer laboratories to access nutrition materials available on the World Wide Web, analyze diets, and create multimedia projects.
  • Use the electronic teaching platform “BlackBoard.” Within BlackBoard I continue to learn and use new features to enhance my teaching.
  • Have students use a variety of computer application software in creating presentations, pamphlets, and assessment tools.
  • Have students use a variety of online databases to enhance learning and critical thinking.
  • Encourage students to interact with professionals in the county and state nutrition communities to both understand and participate in positions available in nutrition.

Instructor

  • FSN 415 : Nutrition Education and Communication
  • FSN 416 : Community Nutrition
  • FSN 417 : Nutrition Counseling
  • FSN 250 : Food and Culture
  • FSN 461, 462 : Senior Project 1 and 2


Dr. Samantha Gill, Natural Resources and Management Department

I. Impact on Students

A. There are several learning objectives that I try to achieve in many of my classes. These include:

1. Several of the classes I teach involve the use of technology, including but not limited to computers and field equipment, including advanced instruments such as total stations, global positioning systems (GPS), and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). In these courses, one of my objectives is for students to become comfortable using technology. I want the students to feel comfortable with the existing technology and to also feel comfortable when new technology is introduced to them.

Student performance for this objective is judged using lab exams in which the students are required to demonstrate their abilities with the equipment. In addition to lab exams, when the students use the equipment in class, I am able to circulate among them, watch them and listen to their questions and their discussions with each other. These observations are often just as revealing about the students understanding as are the lab exams.

2. Another general objective in my classes involves written and oral communication. When students enter the work force, these will be very important skills and I believe they should be emphasized throughout their education.

Written communication is evaluated by writing assignments. In many of my courses at least one written assignment is required per quarter. In some cases, there are several homework assignments that require some writing. Oral communication is generally evaluated through in-class communications and in some instances, assigned oral presentations.

3. Many of my courses have quantitative components. In these courses, one of my objectives is for students to become comfortable with applying mathematics to natural resources applications.

Assignments, including the hands on collection of necessary data, are the most common method used for assessing student performance, followed by exams. After assignments are completed, they are discussed in class. In this way I can often assess the student's command of the material.

B. During the past eight years, I have been advisor to approximately 75 students in the Forestry and Natural Resources (FNR) major. These activities included:

  • Helping students plan their schedules, not only for one quarter, but for their entire time at Cal Poly.
  • Helped several students who were on academic probation. Many of these students are no longer on academic probation and are now well on their way to completing their degrees.
  • Faculty advisor for Xi Sigma Pi, the national forestry honor society and co-advisor for the Cal Poly Logging Team for the last eight years.
  • Scholarship coordinator for the FNR program. In this capacity, I have developed a web page (available from the NRM web page: http://nrm.calpoly.edu) listing the scholarships available to FNR students.

II. Curriculum Development

A. During the 2004-2005 academic year I was involved in the following activities that relate to curriculum development:

  • Taught FNR 317 World of Spatial Data. This was the first time this class was offered. It was developed by a committee with representatives from across the university and is cross-listed at BIO/LA/FNR/GEOG 317. I will be teaching this course again this academic year.
  • I and the other surveying instructors received a teaching grant to continue the development of modules for a web page on surveying equipment. With this grant, we were able to develop web pages for three modules and we are currently working on a fourth module.
  • Developed Blackboard web pages for most of the courses I regularly teach.
  • Active member of the Natural Resources Management (NRM) curriculum committee which works on curriculum for the Forestry and Natural Resources Management major and the Environmental Management and Protection major.

B. Student learning for the FNR curriculum and the graduate curriculum may be evaluated by the number of students entering the program, completing the program and the amount of time it takes students to complete the major. The courses I teach may be evaluated through not only the grades received by students and student course evaluations, but also by the knowledge the students take from the classes that they will need to apply in later courses. Several of the courses listed are prerequisites for other FNR classes and thus the information will be applied later. For example, many of the senior level classes now require GIS, so by discussions with other faculty members it will be possible to evaluate if the students are learning the necessary material.


III. Professional Development

A. I took the following steps to advance my familiarity and effectiveness of with innovative models of instruction:

  • I attended the College of Agriculture Instructor Dale Carnegie Mini Conference.
  • I developed a teaching portfolio during the spring of 1998 and I now update this portfolio every quarter.

B. I have several opportunities to share my teaching experiences with others:

  • I have worked with Brian Dietterick, and David Yun, in re-organizing the FNR 318 course and in looking at ways to enhance the effectiveness of this course. This is a very "hands on" computer intensive course. We have had major software upgrades almost every year.
  • I have worked with Norm Pillsbury to ensure that the same topics are covered in both FNR 215 and FNR 315.

C. Other professional development activities:

  • During the past year I have been involved in several applied research projects. During the 2004-2005 academic year I have been principal investigator or co-principal investigator for several grants. Several of these grants are for multiple years. Students have been involved in several aspects of these projects, including data collection and analysis. From these projects over an eight year period, there have been over twenty students hired as student assistants, seven senior projects and nine internships over the last seven years. Student involvement has been a crucial part of my research program and students have played a very critical role. In addition to the experiences gained by these individual students, information learned from these projects has been incorporated into several classes. Results from these projects have been published in proceedings and peer reviewed publications. One such paper and presentation (Gill, Strohman, Vienna, and Mason. "Comparison of hypsometers" in Proceedings of Society of American Foresters 2002 National Convention. Pp 77-83) included two undergraduate students (Vienna and Mason) which is a unique opportunity for undergraduate students. Also, through these grants state of the art equipment has been bought that will be used throughout the department.
  • During the 2004-2005 academic year, I attended two professional conferences.
  • I am the Chair of the National Inventory Working Group for the Society of American Foresters. This is a nationally elected position.

Instructor

  • BRAE 237 : Engineering Surveying
  • FNR 201 : Introduction to Forest Ecosystem Management
  • FNR 215 : Land and Resource Measurements
  • FNR/BRAE 247 : Forest Surveying
  • FNR 290 : Intercollegiate Forestry Activities
  • FNR 315 : Measurements and Sampling in Forested Environments
  • FNR 317 : World of Spatial Data (cross-listed as BIO/LA/FNR/GEOG 317)
  • FNR 318 : Applications in GIS
  • FNR 400 : Special Problems for Advanced Undergraduates
  • FNR 461 : Senior Project


COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN   Top

Mr. Michael Lucas, Architecture Department

I. Impact on Students

A. Student Learning and Performance Outcomes

The three learning objectives I attempt in my courses in effect frame my own architectural theory: an outlook that is centered about the individual as subject within the various media of architecture.

  • First, and foremost, architecture entails the constructions of new realities based on the dreams and aspirations of living people, requiring a moving from self and seeing life through the other. While seemingly an abstract idea it engenders empathy with clients and users and raises sensitivity to cultural differences and choices.

    The evidence of this exposure was in the care with which the students unconcealed the existential roots behind and in construction of their programs for architectural development. This is program based on the culture and activity patterns of the individuals instead of simple square footages. My ultimate criteria for judging this work was whether the students could describe and make manifest their work as the carrier of intentions of these individuals. This aspect has been, in my opinion, across the board successful. Anecdotal information relayed verbally to me by the clients and critics also supported this.

  • Second, architecture entails a perceivable, irrevocable change to the land itself and thus requires a necessary understanding of eco-phenomenology to enable a sensitive as well as a possible significant manipulation. I stress a thorough understanding of the geologic, climatic, archeological and anthropological processes which have brought a place to its current iteration of being, but engagement in the immediacy of the revealed place is critical to me. This also allows an introduction of the ethical positions about sustainability, which will only grow in importance during the students’ professional careers.
  • Lastly, architecture entails the poetics of construction, or tectonics. In fall quarter we undertook field trips, which were selected to compliment a rigorous series of readings on the history and theory of tectonics. In spring quarter the students were asked to consider how to represent actual constructions and materials within their work. I was completely satisfied with the intensity and inventiveness with which most students approached this study. The final evidence of application was in the project installations in the settings diverse as Poly Canyon, the cavernous Pavilion at Cal Poly's Performing Arts Center, and galleries and spatial niches around the campus buildings. Going beyond mere display, student work included scaled wall section models, actual material collages, large scale drawings, model bases, and digital animations and rendering. I have encouraged and supported remote installations as well, including one thesis reassembled at the Burning Man Festival in the Nevada desert and another on property adjacent to Montana de Oro. This work was selected by peer review process for papers presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture and other venues.

    The method for this increased sensitivity within the students comes from being able to immerse ones self in the qualitative aspects of each encountered site and evolve personal methods of description. For the year long thesis study I required students to select sites available for field trips and required hand drawn images, on-site field notions geared to maps or narratives of sequential site description, on-site dimensioned drawings and scaled models of the land derived from on-site observations. Physical and digital models reflecting this understanding were constructed in fall, and continuously built upon and elaborated throughout the year.

    The evidence assembled in lab by the thesis students and available to the students throughout their architectural investigations for the year provided an effective lasting sense of being within a particular setting instead of looking at a particular setting. Students were able to articulate in juried presentations the nature of their sites. The ability to harness this description varied however, and I found myself using examples from across the class spectrum to evoke stronger responses in all of the students. This produced effective grounding in the natural context for the students to build upon in my critical judgment and that of invited professional outside critics from the University and community.


B. Student Progress to Degree

  • Since winter 2005 I have been Associate Department Head. I have been assigned to aid in support of students from supplementing the Department Head as signatory to coordinating our co-op program.
  • I was an Academic Counselor for the Architecture Department. This exposure to the best as well as those on academic probation broadened my empathy to student issues and informed my curriculum committee role in addition to helping students find ways to continue, succeed and excel.
  • I have also allowed oversubscription to my labs and seminars. As our department has been heavily impacted in admissions, this reduces students being kept back from required classes. I allowed a large number of students in my lecture course (see below) per their graduation needs.

II. Curriculum Development

A. Instructional Design Activities

  • I have reworked Architecture:Education:Transformation annually since Spring 1998, and it is currently taught as On Presence. It continues to be one of the most sought after thesis offerings in our department (approx 30% of the fifth year class of 2005 candidates as their first choice among ten, and by over 60% as first, second or third choice). The content was seen as cross disciplinary while accommodating student choice of topic and common point of departure with research.
  • In 2003-04 I offered Native American Architecture and Place for the first time as a culmination of several grants and research papers. The course was cross-listed in Architecture (ARCH X370) and Ethnic Studies (ES X370), granted GE C4 status, received USCP approval, and granted elective status within Sustainable Environments and Ethnic Studies minors. This was done as a voluntary overload in my teaching for the year. The class was oversubscribed, and drew over 60 students, and resulted in 48 registrations in a class with a limit of 34. It was offered again in spring 2005 with similar draw. I am currently submitting it as a permanent course for the 2007-09 Catalogue.
  • I served as a member of the Diversity in the Curriculum Task Force where we examined the degree in which students are exposed to issues of diversity within our teaching on campus.
  • I continued as a member of the General Education Committee. This group reviewed course content for the new general education template and writing intensive requirements, which affects the entire University student body.
  • Since 2002 I have been Chair of the Senate United States Cultural Pluralism Committee reviewing and recommending approvals/modifications to coursework, and which began its own self-assessment process.


B. Student Learning Attributable to Curricular Activities

The evaluation of the senior thesis work involves a periodic review of writing and design, primarily self-directed, but reviewed and including approved project timetables, milestones and goals. I think my student evaluations speak for themselves. Student enthusiasm for the goals of the course is evident in their heavy oversubscription. I feel this was fueled by student word of mouth and a perception that the lab is difficult but rewarding, and fills an important role for the students prior to entry into the profession. My students are prepared for graduate study as indicated by my students of the last few years continuing with graduate architectural studies at the Architectural Association and Bartlett School in London, McGill, Cornell, Harvard, Columbia, MIT and Penn as well as pursuing advanced degrees in business and law.

My Native American Architecture and Place class was designed as a writing intensive class and I assembled digital archives of student research and presentations. The topic-outline-draft-presentation-final paper process assured a higher level of passing students by giving early opportunity to correct conceptual flaws, suggest added depth or additional research paths.


III. Professional Development

  • Attended workshops by the Center for Teaching and Learning on e-portflios, blackboard and technologies.
  • Expanded previous grant work entitled Toward a Phenomenology of American Space to include supplemental depth to Northwest Native American/First Nations peoples, visiting sites in the Howe Sound and Fraser River Canyon areas of British Columbia. The project documents particular attitudes toward the landscape, and how this knowledge has changed over the recent past. I implemented this in coursework for "Native American Architecture and Place" class.
  • Developed a revised compact disc based reader for my thesis seminar. This makes available to students work that may have limited duration elsewhere from internet based sources, and provides a paperless medium to annotate and quote from for their own research. I used e-mail broadcast as a method of daily communication with my thesis students, which allowed more lab time to be used for individual personal contact. I also used the net as a method of preliminary criticism of thesis drafts, eliminating paper waste and more easily accommodating student and personal availability during out-of-lab times. Some of the mechanics of these techniques mirror the Course Info web server/software package available to Cal Poly faculty and I am evaluating that as a future mechanism that offers even greater resources for facilitating the class.
  • Each of my design labs has invited colleagues to participate in criticism and evaluation of student work, both “in progress” and as an exit review/exhibit. This allows the explicit review of the course methodology as well as the student work and was a great benefit to me for faculty and staff feedback on the courses. This year over 30 faculty and staff contributed to the evaluations.
  • The group of nine thesis faculty met more frequently this year as we approached changes in the departmental curriculum which affected our fifth year group. A group show for all the fifth year thesis projects was implemented in Chumash Auditorium as a closing exercise.


Dr. Pamalee Brady, Architectural Engineering Department

Overview

This report is the Department’s eighth summary of the progress of the Cal Poly Plan (CPP) project. The Plan funded an Assistant Professor tenure track position to develop and implement an improved program of offerings for the department service courses to Construction Management (CM) and Architecture (ARCH). The Cal Poly Plan funding permitted the Department to hire Pamalee Brady as the Cal Poly Plan faculty member, the actual teaching load is shared by many faculty members.

The Cal Poly Plan proposal was targeted towards an improved number of service course offerings and a review (including implementation of change) of the content of the courses and course pedagogy. This past academic year was the first year of implementation of the new course sequence. Initial assessments appear to indicate that the revised courses are more successful, as measured by better retention of the course material, as well as a reduced attrition rate from the courses.

Additionally, without the Cal Poly Plan position the department would have been unable to offer the appropriate number of courses. With a significant amount of rescheduling, the department was able to provide most of the needed service courses during the academic year with a summer session of service courses effectively meeting the rest of the demand of the departments.

This past academic year proposals for the entire course sequence were submitted to the university and approved by the academic senate. The changes are now reflected in the 2005-2007 Catalog.

Introduction

Providing effective service courses can be a complex issue. It is important to provide good through-put opportunities, however the demand for course offerings is dependent on other departments. It is important to provide relevant course material that meets the desired learning outcomes as determined by other departments. One trap in providing these service courses is the notion that what was done in the past continues to meet the changing needs of the students. It is appropriate to step back and look at the learning objectives and evaluate the department’s effectiveness in meeting those goals. This review has already been completed and the new curriculum sequence has been documented and submitted to the university for approval.

Impact on Students

Several key observations demonstrate the impact of program improvement on student’s progress to degree. There had been a decline in demand for certain courses. A study showed that the same numbers of students were taking the course but fewer students were having to retake the course because of a failing grade. This can be attributed to the focus on student learning brought about by the Plan and the revisions to the department’s accreditation program. These courses are all lecture courses with somewhat intense technical material. With a broad range of students in the same classroom, instructor-student contact time is important to learning. Class size played a key role in the improved success of the students.

Curriculum Development

What was found with the 6-course sequence being offered by the department is that the department was teaching a traditional sequence of sound engineering course work. When this was re-framed into the notion of desired learning outcomes a different approach was postulated. The approach was based on the learning outcomes desired by the ARCH and CM departments based on some excellent dialogue. The discussions were not about how to teach or what courses to teach but about what those departments wanted their students to learn, and retain, as a result of the sequence.

What came out of the discussion was a rethinking of both what and how to teach. The “how” delves into pedagogy and the “what” deals with the content sequence. As a side issue but quite important to student progress is that of the number of classes. At present there is little time flexibility in that students must take 6 courses in 6 quarters to reach their departmental goals. The faculties of the three programs involved have reached consensus on the form and content of a revised course sequence.

Professional Development

There are two areas of professional development that might apply to this effort.

  • Since these are service courses being taught by engineers to students of multiple disciplines, the instructors must be current on what is needed in their own profession as well as that of the students being taught.
  • The collaborative aspects of curriculum development have created considerable interaction between the ARCE faculty and the other two departments. This collaboration amongst peers has been long over due and is precedent setting for the departments. A new level of interaction and trust has been established which is a very positive sign.

Summary and Outlook

Without the Cal Poly Plan faculty position the department would not have been able to offer the appropriate number and quality of courses this past academic year. The Plan has given impetus to the curricular review which will give Cal Poly one of the most advanced learning oriented course sequences available. The newer faculty have embraced the new thinking and the incoming faculty all have credentials which will allow for their integration into the effort to complete the task at hand.




ORFALEA COLLEGE OF BUSINESS   Top

Dr. Larry Gorman, Finance Department

Impact on Students

Three of the most significant learning outcomes that I have attempted to foster in my courses:

  • Coverage of quantitative topics not covered at most other universities (e.g. writing code)
  • Formal analysis of equities using five different styles of valuation models.
  • Use of Bloomberg for analyzing equities, and subsequent investment in these equities.
Measure of Success
The students who undertake these classes often get 'premium' jobs at both corporations and investment banks)

In my role as advisor to the local Financial Management Association (FMA) club I can make an impact on student learning and their progress toward degree. I often informally advise students on extra classes they should take, beyond those required, in order to gain a firm handle on the primary concepts and to build a strong set of tools for success in the work place.

Curriculum Development

  • Continued development of the Student Managed Portfolio Program (SMPP) most recently incorporating the Bloomberg analysis system.
  • Development of advanced programming problems in Financial Engineering (BUS-444).
Measure of Success
Our program will be able to determine our student learning attributable to our instructional activities, courses and/or curricular models by letting the market speak. If successful, then these students should be landing 'premium jobs' at premium salaries.

Professional Development

I incorporate some of these materials and discussion techniques in my Cal Poly classes - when appropriate.

I wrote and circulated a report last year detailing how my instructional style differs from that employed by others in the department, and presented statistical evidence that it works significantly better.



Dr. Kate Lancaster, Accounting Department

Impact on Students

Three of the most significant learning outcomes that I have attempted to foster in my courses:

  • Team based learning in traditional lecture based classes.
  • Use of accounting information to assist in making managerial decisions that are sustainable.
  • Experiential learning activities such as cookie manufacturing to illustrate accounting concepts.

I am the advisor for the Cal Poly Accounting club, which provides information sessions for students related to curricular decisions for the accounting concentration. The Cal Poly Accounting club is also involved with representatives from the public accounting profession including career symposia and weekly guests from the accounting profession. This advising helps to mentor students on career choices. I also informally advise students on career decisions. Additionally, I supervise an independent study class for leaders in accounting clubs and activities to develop leadership skills and help students attain the required units to sit for the CPA exam under pathway 2.

Curriculum Development

  • Helped to develop and deliver BUS 429 - Accounting Process Analysis. Worked with colleagues and accounting professionals to develop a course that prepares students for the challenges posed by meeting Sarbanes Oxley requirements.
  • Participated in the Accounting Area Curriculum committee that worked with the Graduate Committee to prepare a program of study for accounting students interested in a graduate program to satisfy state Certified Public Accounting licensing requirements. In addition, this project included preparation of new courses for this program that were included in the 2005-2007 catalog revisions.

Professional Development

  • Invited panelist for CPE session "Implementing the IMA's Practice Analysis Findings in the Introductory Management Accounting Course" at the AAA 2004 Annual meeting.
  • Presented paper at AIS Educators Conference, June 2004 "Business Processes and Internal Controls: Learning by Doing" with Todd Sayre.
  • Attended AIS Educators Conference, June 2004.
  • Attended KPMG Faculty Symposium, July 2004.
  • Attended and participated in various continuing professional education sessions at the AAA 2004 Annual meeting.


COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   Top

The reports will be coming soon.

Dr. Lanny Griffin, Materials Engineering Department

Dr. Yarrow Nelson, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department

Dr. Robert Crockett, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department

Dr. Tim Kearns, Computer Science Department
Dr. Jordi Puig-Suari, Aerospace Engineering Department
Dr. Art McCarly, Electrical Engineering Department


COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS   Top
Dr. David Gillette, English Department

Learning Goals/Measures

To help students gain first-hand experience with the field of virtual reality and how that field is informed by the theories of narrative design, rhetoric, oral/visual/textual persuasion, and experience design presented and explored in ENGL 411 and ENGL 412, I connected an ongoing technology development and research project (Lumiere Ghosting) with the core curriculum of the newly-developing program in New Media Arts at Cal Poly.

The test for the success of this integration was setting a date when the students and faculty involved would be able to put on a demonstration (for public display, critique and evaluation) of how all these theories and practices can be combined into a singular technological device (the CompuObscura). This test was run during Open House, in Spring 05. Based on the positive results of the surveys we conducted (on paper and through video interview) and through the extremely positive and excited commentary we received from invited guests (Cal Poly administrators, commercial clients/partners, Cal Poly technical support staff) it is clear to all involved that we met our learning goals and outcomes for Fall 04-Summer 05. We are now preparing to repeat this pedagogy and technology development process, with new curriculum elements, a new on-campus development space, and with new students in Fall 05, continuing on through Winter-Summer 06.

The primary goal for Fall 04-Summer 05 was to fully integrate the Lumiere Ghosting Project and the development of the CompuObscura device with the project/course work for some of the new core courses for the New Media Art program (ENGL 411: New Media Art I, ENGL 412: New Media Art II). To achieve this goal, the Lumiere Ghosting Project curriculum needed to be tested in a variety of courses, for a variety of different student audiences, and a supportive relationship between the Lumiere Ghosting Project and an outside, commercial agency needed to be established to help support long term development work on the full-scale construction, testing, and revision of the CompuObscura device.

I revised the curriculum for ENGL 411 and 412 to ensure a tighter integration with the goals and intention of the Lumiere Ghosting project, and also (in conjunction with my research partner from Architecture, Thomas Fowler) managed to establish a firm working partnership with one of the largest commercial players in the field of 3D and VR visualization systems, EON Reality Inc.

Measure of Success:
To measure the success of this curriculum integration and company partnership, I worked with Thomas Fowler to put on a demonstration of early-stage CompuObscura technologies and techniques during the Cal Poly Open House in Spring 05. The successful run of this show required the careful integration of the design and theory curriculums from ENGL 411 and ENGL 412 with the curriculum for the Architecture courses taught by Thomas Fowler and Tom DiSanto in Winter 05 and Spring 05, culminating with a team-teaching/team-lecture arrangement in Spring 05 shared between Fowler, DiSanto and myself. As part of this team-teaching/team-lecture arrangement, I (and by extension, the Lumiere Ghosting Project) served as the "client" for the Architecture students who built and then ran a show as a proof-of-concept demonstration of the CompuObscura, based on the project designs and theories developed by my students in ENGL 411 in Fall 04 and ENGL 412 in Winter 05.

Funding from the Internet II initiative allowed us to pay for the design and programming skills of one of our project consultants (Jon Elsdon), and to pay for materials to build the container of the CompuObscura. The hardware for the CompuObscura was provided through Cal Poly ITS purchases and through long-term loans of various projection and computation systems.

All the visualization software for the project was provided at no expense through EON Inc, and we also received free software and a great deal of technical support through an additional agreement we established with WorldViz (a small 3D design and visualization/animation company in Santa Barbara). A small part of the funds from the Internet II initiative and from additional project support from Cal Poly ITS provided us the funds we required to rent motion tracking equipment from WorldViz, allowing us to add a good deal of audience interaction to the CompuObscura proof-of-concept demonstration.

The results of the Open House show were documented through hours of video interviews with the show participants, creators and project developers. This video footage was summarized in a short film I put together and distributed on DVD at the end of Spring 05.

This pedagogy and technology development process was such a success, both in terms of teaching and learning and in terms of commercial partnership and support, Thomas Fowler and I are continuing with a new version of this collaboration for the 05-06 academic year, beginning with a new demonstration of the CompuObscura device and the theories and curriculum components of the Lumiere Ghosting Project to be put on display during Cal Poly Homecoming, Fall 05. If all the technology works out properly and we have the necessary agreements in place, we also hope to run a test of some of the first international connections between the CompuObscura and an overseas collection of students and participants (possibly from the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia where I will be teaching for Cal Poly study abroad in Winter 06).

Professional Development:

Funding/Awards

  • $7,000 Internet II, phase III funding."TheLumiere Ghosting Project & the CompuObscura: an Internet-driven, multi-site interactive study of cross-cultural narrative transmission & transformation" - Internet II Initiative, Cal Poly. Co-applicant: Enrica Lovaglio.
  • $5,144 CLA Grant. "New Media Arts Interdisciplinary Teaching & Research Funding Request Developing the CompuObscura Prototype Structure" - Development Seed Money for CLA Project Development.
  • $7,700 Additional Technology Support and Rental. Informal project support connected to support for the Cal Poly Library Learning Commons Project, provided through ITS, Cal Poly.

Peer Reviewed Publications

  • "Lumiere Ghosting and the New Media Classroom." Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology and Pedagogy. Volume 9, Issue 2, Spring 2005.
  • "Looking to Cinema for Direction: Incorporating Motion into On-Screen Presentations of Technical Information." Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication. Volume 52, Number 2, May 2005.

Juried Conference Proceedings Publications

  • "Faculty & Student Usability & Focus Group Findings Inform Digital Teaching Library Interface Requirements." Proceedings of the 2005 Syllabus Conference, Los Angeles, California, July 2005. Co-author: Mary Somerville (Assistant Dean, Cal Poly Library).
  • "Speaking with the Global Voice of Cinema: Using Cross-Cultural Cinematic Technique to Improve Interactive System Usability." Proceedings of the IEEE/IPCC 2005 International Conference, Limerick, Ireland, July 2005.
  • "Putting the Poetry of Film to Use Online." Proceedings of the 52nd Annual International STC Conference, Seattle, Washington, May 2005.
  • "Speaking with a Cinematic Voice: Adopting techniques from motion pictures into the presentation of technical information." Proceedings of the 8th Annual ATTW National Conference, San Francisco, California, March 2005.

Juried Conference Presentations

  • "Interaction Design Techniques Inform Digital Teaching Library Implementation." 2005 Syllabus Conference, Los Angeles, California, July 2005. Co-Presenters: Erika Rogers (Director, Honors Program, Cal Poly), Mary Somerville (Assistant Dean, Library, Cal Poly).
  • "Speaking with the Global Voice of Cinema: Using Cross-Cultural Cinematic Technique to Improve Interactive System Usability." IEEE/IPCC 2005 International Conference, Limerick, Ireland, July 2005.
  • "Putting the Poetry of Film to Use Online." 52nd Annual International STC Conference, Seattle, Washington, May 2005.
  • "Usability on the Cheap and Dirty: Practical suggestions on how to set up, run, and evaluate an effective usability test for little or no money." 52nd Annual International STC Conference, Seattle, Washington, May 2005. Co-Presenters: Ryan LaBarre, Eliot Burns, Christie Thompson.
  • "Speaking with a Cinematic Voice: Adopting techniques from motion pictures into the presentation of technical information." 8th Annual ATTW National Conference, San Francisco, California, March 2005.

Instructor

  • English 411 : Interactive Documents – 40 students (2 sections)
  • English 318 : Advanced Professional Writing – 17 students (1 section)
  • English 149 : Tech Writing for Engineers – 43 students (2 sections)
  • English 519 : Web Authoring – 15 students (1 section)
  • English 400 : Special Problems for Advanced Independent Study – 2 students (1 section)
  • English 461 : Senior Project – 2 students



Dr. Penny Osmond, Graphic Communication Department

Learning Goals/Measures

GrC 201 Electronic Publishing: On completing this course, the student will gain an understanding of:

  • The evolution and technology of traditional and electronic publishing systems.
  • The tools, materials, processes, specifications and professional roles which control the way documents are produced and published for print and electronic media.
  • The performance of an electronic publishing system through hands-on experience with software and hardware used in graphic communications.
  • The methodologies to properly prepare electronic files, and problem-solving techniques to successfully process files throughout the publication process.

Measure of Success:
Students complete required written tests and quizzes. But more importantly students complete eight hands-on laboratory assignments including a final project.

GrC 203 Electronic Prepress: The students are able to:

  • Understand the terminology used in electronic prepress.
  • Understand and be able to perform the steps in assembling both simple and complex files.
  • Recognize the appropriateness of trapping and understand the various methods employed in production.
  • Understand how to build colors and angle screens.
  • Understand PostScript output systems, and their role in current workflow.
  • Understand how to use different file formats, fonts and imposition software in production.
  • Understand the role and importance of preflighting and preflight software.

Measure of Success:
Students complete required written tests and quizzes. They also complete six hands-on lab projects and two hands-on lab quizzes. Students complete a final project that requires them to use all the skills learned throughout the quarter to complete the project.

GrC 337 Consumer Packaging: Students can:

  • Understand the role of consumer packaging in our society
  • Understand the various components important to package design
  • Understand the relationship between consumer packaging and marketing strategy
  • Understand the production process of various consumer packages

Measure of Success:
Students complete written tests and quizzes. They also write a final paper and present a final project that includes the use of the skills learned throughout the quarter.


Professional Development

  • Publication, Flexo Magazine-April 2005 "Printing Beyond CMYK: Expanded Gamut Printing Extends Flexo Capabilities, Improves Profits." Co-Authored with Mike Buystedt.
  • Equipment donations include Printa Systems Pad Printing Unit, Dye Sublimation System and Heat Transfer equipment and Kodak First Check Proofer designed primarily for packaging prototypes.
  • Presentation at GraphExpo in Chicago in September 2004 on Variable Data Printing.
  • Participated in industry training through GrCI in the area of Digital Printing.

Instructor

  • GrC 201 : Electronic Publishing - 76 students (2 sections)
  • GrC 203 : Electronic Prepress - 74 students (2 sections)
  • GrC 337 : Consumer Packaging - 78 students (2 sections)
  • GrC 357 : Screen Printing - 30 students (1 section)



Dr. Paul Rinzler, Music Department

Learning Goals/Measures

The most important goal for students in the jazz studies program is to improve their musicianship and creativity. This is measured by comparing the level of musicianship and creativity before rehearsing and after (the culmination being a public performance).

This improvement is measured by the higher level of musicianship and creativity required for a public performance (compared to a lower level before the repertoire is rehearsed).

Professional Development

Internet

  • I maintained a series of Web pages for my classes and educational materials for downloading (cla.calpoly.edu/~prinzler).
  • I started a web site for the University Jazz Bands (cla.calpoly.edu/~prinzler/UJBWebSite/indexCLA.html).

Performances

  • Clinic for the International Association of Jazz Educators convention, Long Beach
  • Jazz gig, Paul Rinzler quartet, The Hamlet Jazz Club, Cambria
  • Faculty Recital, Uncertified All-Stars, Unity Church, SLO
  • Jazz gig, biweekly, Grappolo Restaurant, SLO

Software

  • Software listening guides for Essential Jazz (jazz history text), published by Wadsworth Publishing

Other Activities

  • Adjudicator, Santa Barbara H.S. Jazz Festival
  • Pre-concert lecture, Lincoln Center Jazz Orchestra

Service

  • President, SLO County Jazz Federation
  • Member, Academic Senate
  • Chair, Faculty Dispute Review Committee

Instructor

  • MU 170 : University Jazz Band: 37 students (4 sections)
  • MU 171 : Instrumental Ensembles: 10 students (2 sections)
  • MU 221 : Jazz Styles: 143 students
  • MU 259 : Beginning Jazz Improvisation: 15 students
  • MU 370 : University Jazz Band: 21 students (4 sections)
  • MU 371 : Instrumental Ensemble: 7 students (2 sections)



COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS   Top

Dr. Susan Elrod, Biological Sciences Department

Dr. Elrod is in her second year as a tenured faculty member and associate professor. She continues her excellent record of teaching with a strong professional development program. This past year Dr. Elrod served her second year as Associate Department Chair of Biological Sciences, and as Chair of the Academic Senate Curriculum Committee. Other leadership roles have been as Vice Chair of the Academic Senate and Assistant Director for the Center for Teaching and Learning. Dr. Elrod will be working as a special assistant to the Provost to organize and facilitate the operational program review of the Academic Programs office, reviewing current university academic policies and recommend revisions and new policies.

Instructor

  • BIO 351 : Principles of Genetics
  • BIO 400 : Special Problems for Advanced Undergraduates
  • BIO 461 : Senior Project
  • MCRO 433 : Microbial Biotechnology
  • SCM 201 : Orientation to Biotechnology



Dr. Elsa Medina, Mathematics Department

Dr. Medina is beginning her sixth year at Cal Poly. She continues to develop as an excellent teacher; her specialty is mathematics education. She has a promising professional development program including two publications; a grant from the American Association of State Colleges and Universities on Improving the Mathematics Subject-Matter Preparation of Elementary School Teachers; and continuation of the Cal Poly Mathematics Project. She made several presentations, including one at the 10th International Congress of Mathematical Education in Copenhagen. She had a leadership role in the preparation of the mathematics program submission to the California Commission for Teacher Credentialing. Dr. Medina is Director of the California Math Project at Cal Poly. During summer 2005 she directed the Mathematics Summer Institute, an in-service teacher education workshop for high school and elementary school teachers.

Instructor

  • EDUC 469 : Part-Time Student Teaching
  • EDUC 479 : Student Teaching
  • MATH 141 : Calculus I
  • MATH 142 : Calculus II
  • MATH 328 : Mathematics for Elementary Teaching II
  • MATH 329 : Mathematics for Elementary Teaching III
  • MATH 400 : Special Problems for Advanced Undergraduates
  • MATH 461, 462 : Senior Project



Dr. Antonio Garcia, Physics Department

Dr. Garcia is beginning his fifth year at Cal Poly; his specialty is field based Quaternary geology. He is developing well in teaching with his use of materials in the classroom and field excursions with his students. This year he has been involved in curriculum development for the Minor in Geology, developing and teaching the new Geol X395 Structural Geology course, and extensively revising the content in the Geomorphology SS/ERSC 323 course. He has established an active and productive professional development program in geomorphological research, which involves Cal Poly students in substantial ways. He has submitted a manuscript for review to The Geological Society of America Bulletin. He continues as a resource to the community and is active in giving presentations on geology and related topics.

Instructor

  • GEOL 102 : Introduction to Geology
  • GEOL 201 : Physical Geology
  • GEOL 241 : Physical Geology Laboratory
  • GEOL X395: Structural Geology
  • GEOL 401 : Field-Geology Methods
  • GEOL 402 : Geological Mapping
  • SS/ERSC 323 : Rocks and Minerals


Top


Cal Poly Home | Cal Poly Find It
 
Home | Central Features | RFPs | Projects | Initiatives | Faculty Positions | CPP Steering Committee | FAQ | Site Map

Last Update: 10/27/05

Office of the Provost
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
805.756.2186
academicaffairs@calpoly.edu